8/7/2023 0 Comments One america news spectrum![]() ![]() What are these politicians thinking?Īs long as Roe v. Ron DeSantis of Florida signed into law a strict six-week limit on abortion access, a move that surely will not benefit his campaign for the presidency. In North Carolina, Tricia Cotham (from a heavily Democratic district) defected to the Republican Party to help pass a highly restrictive abortion law - although Cotham had been a vocal defender of abortion rights before her switch. The biggest surprise, though, might be the continuing actions by some states to ignore the flashing red lights of voter outrage, and to continue to pass increasingly restrictive laws. Expect further outrage and strong reaction if it does. Incredibly, with these judges - and this Supreme Court - the lawsuit might succeed. They cherry-picked the venue to ensure the most abortion-hating judge, and the most radically conservative federal appellate court. It would be equally surprising that the lawsuit hasn’t already been thrown out for several independently sufficient reasons (no party has been injured, and the approval process was entirely by-the-book) except for the plaintiffs’ strategy in bringing the case in Texas. ![]() The results of the federal midterm elections were a ringing repudiation of the court’s activism, and underscored that, for a majority of voters, there was no going back to the day when women lacked legal agency over their bodies.Ī bigger surprise has been the effort to undo, through litigation, the FDA’s approval of mifepristone, one of the two drugs used in combination to induce abortions during the early stages of pregnancy. Wade and because of the court’s complete failure to consider the effect on women seeking the procedure, would benefit Democrats,but I underestimated the depth of outrage it would create. I did expect that Dobbs, both because it overruled Roe v. When voters in the deep red state of Kansas decidedly rejected a proposed amendment to the state’s constitution that would have declared there was no right to abortion in the state, I knew something seismic had occurred. I’ve been somewhat surprised, but buoyed, by the groundswell of opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs. John Culhane is Distinguished Professor of Law and co-Director of the Family Health Law & Policy Institute at Delaware Law School, and the author of More Than Marriage: Forming Families After Marriage Equality. ‘I underestimated the depth of outrage’ By John Culhane Jackson Women’s Health Organization will likely reverberate for years to come. And that the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Ultimately, even in a time of political paralysis, this past year proved that our politics is never predictable, even on our most polarizing issues. And in a reminder of just how divisive the issue is, some of our contributors even disagreed on the very impact of Dobbs: a transformative event or “business as usual.” Meanwhile, the legal battle over abortion, far from taking a pause as some expected, quickly returned to the courts. Among the surprises is that voters didn’t necessarily respond in the way some might have predicted, including in the reddest of states where anti-abortion measures failed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |